We have the policy of requiring up-to-date dependencies instead of
adding conditionals for older versions. libinput 1.14 was published more
than 1 year ago.
Every host seat with pointer capability propagates events to one of
sub-pointer depending which output window we entered.
active_pointer tracks reference to sub-pointer on enter/leave events to
avoid lookup for it on every move events.
Fixesswaywm/wlroots#1499
This effectively gets swaywm/wlroots#1499 to the point where
functionality somewhat preserved and no crash happens.
We still can have only one cursor, but we can control it from multiple
seats in time-sharing manner by entering/leaving output.
xdg_popups can be destroyed by the compositor when closed. When this happens,
wlroots makes the xdg_popup surface inert and resets the xdg_surface role to
NONE.
Currently, wlroots sends a protocol error and asserts that an xdg_surface has
a role when committed. This is racy if at the same time the client commits an
xdg_popup and the compositor closes it. This patch removes the assertion and
ignores commits on xdg_surfaces without a role set.
We were previously exporting DMA-BUFs when receiving the capture_output
request, and sending a done event on wlr_output.events.precommit. Instead,
export and send done on wlr_output.events.commit.
When performing a modeset, the DRM backend will request a page-flip
event. However frame_pending wasn't set to true, so any subsequent
wlr_output_schedule_frame calls would imemdiately trigger a synthetic
frame event, asking the compositor to submit a new frame. Committing the
new frame fails with "a page-flip is already pending" error in the DRM
backend.
When an output is disabled one last pageflip will happen to disable it.
Currently this pageflip causes a frame event.
Since the output is disabled we don't want to send this frame event.
The resource field of wlr_xdg_positioner is never initialized or
accessed within wlroots. The wl_resource for this interface is stored
in the wlr_xdg_positioner_resource struct.
We already mostly did this, but there were a couple of branches
(`calloc` failures) where we'd bail without letting the other side know.
Refs swaywm/sway#4007. Likely not going to be a real improvement there
(if `calloc` fails you're already pretty screwed), but it does address a
theoretical possibility.
