wlr_keyboard manages the xkb-common state of the compositor.
It used to update the state, update the modifiers, then notify the
compositor.
When [Shift_L] was pressed and released, this resulted in an event chain:
Modifiers: Shift
Key: Shift_L (Pressed)
Modifiers:
Key: Shift_L (Release)
The xkb-docs state that the state should be updated *after* the key was
handled [1], to prevent the new state from influencing the actual key
generated.
To achieve this, the event to the compositor is emitted, *before*
wlroots handles the xkb and internal keyboard state.
With this patch applied, the emitted events ill be:
Modifiers:
Key: Shift_L (Pressed)
Modifiers: Shift
Key: Shift_L (Release)
[1] https://xkbcommon.org/doc/current/group__state.html#gac554aa20743a621692c1a744a05e06ce
When e.g. running rootston under X11 it would otherwise crash when
closing rootston like:
#0 0x00007f0197da7327 in wl_list_remove () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libwayland-server.so.0
#1 0x000056306fcee7fb in handle_destroy (listener=0x5630723a2948, data=0x5630723a5d20) at ../rootston/layer_shell.c:273
#2 0x00007f019800a552 in wlr_signal_emit_safe (signal=0x5630723a5e30, data=0x5630723a5d20) at ../util/signal.c:29
#3 0x00007f0197fef808 in layer_surface_destroy (surface=0x5630723a5d20) at ../types/wlr_layer_shell.c:169
#4 0x00007f0197ff0001 in client_handle_destroy (resource=0x56307229c4c0) at ../types/wlr_layer_shell.c:371
#5 0x00007f0197da2f30 in () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libwayland-server.so.0
#6 0x00007f0197da77f9 in () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libwayland-server.so.0
#7 0x00007f0197da301d in wl_client_destroy () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libwayland-server.so.0
#8 0x00007f0197da30d8 in () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libwayland-server.so.0
#9 0x00007f0197da4c12 in wl_event_loop_dispatch () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libwayland-server.so.0
#10 0x00007f0197da344a in wl_display_run () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libwayland-server.so.0
#11 0x000056306fcef069 in main (argc=3, argv=0x7ffd22032528) at ../rootston/main.c:83
since the output_destroy got already removed in handle_output_destroy.
When the X11 server sends an expose event, that means that "this
rectangle here (the event contains x,y,width,height) has undefined
contents on your window; please redraw that". This means that we need a
swap. However, so far the code does not actually enforce that a swap
happens.
For example, start rootston, switch to another workspace and then switch
back. The rootston window will not be redrawn (before commit
52b058c2a3, it would just be fully white; after that commit it will
show whatever was visible on the old workspace). This is because the
drawing code concludes that nothing needs to be done. However, in fact a
swap is necessary.
This reverts commit e79d924588, because its optimisation is already
done now: wlr_output_update_needs_swap() emits a signal, which is
handled by wlr_output_damage with a call to wlr_output_schedule_frame().
This function does nothing if a frame is already pending. Thus, the
optimisation from commit e79d924588 now happens implicitly.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
When resizing rootston with the mouse, the result is really slow. One
can see that rootston needs quite a while for drawing the newly visible
area. This is because every single expose event is handled on its own
and causes (apparently) a full repaint or at least a swap.
This commit improves things by only causing a new frame if none is
pending already.
With this change, there is almost no delay in rootston drawing the newly
visible area.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Before this commit, the x11 server would fill any exposed area with
white before the wlroots x11 backend got a chance to do anything. This
was e.g. visible when running rootston and resizing the window: When the
window becomes larger, the new area is filled with black.
By just not setting a back pixel value, this commit gets rid of this
behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
handle_x11_event() and x11_handle_input_event() react to different kinds
of events, so it does not make much of a difference if
x11_handle_input_event() signals if it handled an event or not.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
