Add a src_box state field. Use the SRC_* KMS props in the DRM
backend, reject the layers in the Wayland backend (for now, we can
support it later via viewporter).
This makes seat_client resources inert when seats and/or input devices are
destroyed, rather than destroying the resources.
When the client calls e.g. wl_keyboard_release(), it's not expecting the
keyboard global to be already destroyed, so this results in an error such
as this:
wl_display@1: error 0: invalid object 22
Setting the GLESv2 parameter GL_PACK_ALIGNMENT to 1 ensures that the
stride of the glReadPixels output matches the value computed in
`pack_stride`. Since the default value of GL_PACK_ALIGNMENT is 4, this
does not make a difference under normal use; but without this patch
the stride can be incorrect; for example, with RGB565 buffers and
screenshots of regions with odd width.
wlr_output is not well-suited to checking whether direct scan-out
is happening or not. Compositors may want to use their own external
swapchains, for instance.
Additionally, ab7eabac84 ("output: leverage
wlr_output_configure_primary_swapchain()") makes it so
output_basic_test() is called before the output swapchain is
initialized, resulting in false positives.
References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wlroots/wlroots/-/issues/3620
This allows callers to set a destination size different from the
buffer size to scale them.
The DRM backend supports this. The Wayland backend doesn't yet
(we'd need to wire up viewporter).
since wayland doesn't provide a touch id in cancel events, track what
points are active so we can cancel all of them
timestamp is also not provided - use 0 because no one's paying attention
to that anyway
Closes#3000
- Simplifies the backends
- Avoids having two ways to do the same thing: previously one could
disable a layer by either omitting it from wlr_output_state.layers,
or by passing a NULL buffer
- We can change our mind in the future: we can allow users to omit
some layers and define a meaning without breaking the API.
References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wlroots/wlroots/-/merge_requests/4017#note_1783997
When a new client comes in and tries to create a
zwlr_gamma_control_v1 object for an output which already has one,
we were destroying the old object and early-returning. The early
return causes the new object to not be set up properly: it's not
inserted in the list and doesn't get the gamma_size event.
Fix this by destroying the new object, and leave the old object
intact, which is what was the intent I think.
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wlroots/wlroots/-/issues/3605
